From Indicators to Action

In the context of mining and heavy industry, nature data or "nature intelligence" must be transformed from mere indicators into tangible actions that enhance operational resilience, particularly in the face of climate change.

How Nature Data Informs Climate-Resilient Operational Planning

• Front-Loading Risk Discovery and Investment Security: The most effective use is at the pre-project stage. High-resolution data allows companies to screen vast potential sites early to steer clear of "fatal flaws," such as critical habitat for an endangered species. This dramatically increases the chances of gaining necessary permits and social acceptance, securing upfront capital by demonstrating superior risk management to investors who screen projects based on high ESG risk.

• Precision Mitigation and Cost Reduction: Data is essential for making the mitigation hierarchy (Avoid, Minimise, Restore, Offset) a practical reality. Companies can use high-resolution maps to precisely design infrastructure (e.g., haul roads, waste dumps) to avoid sensitive ecosystems like wetlands, reducing the impact footprint and future restoration costs from the outset.

• Designing for Long-Term Liability: High-resolution pre-mining ecosystem data enables operations to be designed 'with the end in mind'. This allows for successful restoration efforts, like strategically saving topsoil, which can significantly shorten the long-term monitoring period and reduce the financial bond held by governments, freeing up capital.

• Calibrating Physical Risk: Nature data is the core of climate resilience. Risk Insights must be calibrated with Ecosystem Condition (EC) and Species Insights. Degraded ecosystems are inherently less resilient and present high levels of risk related to climate (e.g., water security, erosion, pest outbreaks), informing where resources must be allocated to buffer operational sites.

Where Businesses Are Still Under-Using Data

Businesses often fall into the trap of using data solely for minimum-cost compliance, missing the strategic value. Key areas of under-utilisation include:

• Focusing on Compliance, Not Resilience: They rely on basic species detections and habitat mapping currently prescribed in compliance-focused applications, rather than leveraging the data for deeper insights into ecosystem health, function, and resilience.

• Reactive Management: The perspective is still rapidly shifting from viewing biodiversity as a constraint to a critical variable. Many companies are still reacting to environmental issues rather than proactively managing them to gain resilience and strategic advantage.

• Ignoring the Green Commodity Premium: For mining specifically, high-resolution data should be used as the 'passport' to enter high-value 'green' supply chains (e.g., for energy transition minerals) by providing demonstrable proof of responsible environmental management, thus commanding a premium price.

Improving Data Quality

Advancements in biodiversity monitoring technology are creating a nature intelligence layer by moving beyond basic, one-off compliance data to continuous, scalable, and verifiable metrics.

1. eDNA (Environmental DNA)

Technology Advancement Ready to Transform: Metabarcoding and qPCR to quantify Taxonomic Novelty and species persistence.

Impact on Disclosure and Risk Analysis: Moves reporting beyond habitat mapping to auditable, non-subjective data for compliance and due diligence. Significantly improves the quality of Baseline Audit Completeness scores.

2. Bioacoustics and Camera Traps

Technology Advancement Ready to Transform: Continuous Status Monitoring providing real-time proxies like the Acoustic Activity Index (AAI) and Machine Learning (ML) for species identification.

Impact on Disclosure and Risk Analysis: Transforms Operational Risk with Real-Time Compliance Alerts flagging sudden changes or violations in buffer zones. Provides verifiable Performance Tracking data for impact-linked loans and voluntary commitments.

3. Remote Sensing and AI

Technology Advancement Ready to Transform: High-resolution satellite imagery combined with AI to generate Ecosystem Condition (EC) metrics (low, medium, and high resolution).

Impact on Disclosure and Risk Analysis: Enables mandatory Biodiversity Loss-Gain Accounting using metrics like Quality Hectares (QHa) and Ecosystem Intactness. Critical for tracking asset portfolios and landscape-level nature-related risk.

The convergence of these technologies, supported by AI for data analysis and clustering, provides the depth of insights on health, function, and resilience that clients need to prioritise action and manage risk. This data forms the necessary foundation for organisations reporting under the TNFD and CSRD frameworks.

Expectations for 2030

By the end of the decade, the primary differentiator between nature-positive leaders and laggards will be the ability to use high-resolution nature data to confidently link environmental management directly to financial outcomes and strategic resilience.

1. STRATEGIC FOCUS

Leaders (Nature-Positive Performers): View nature management as a strategic business function and a driver of resilience, efficiency, and profit.

Laggards (Compliance-Focused): View nature as a compliance-based cost centre or a regulatory hurdle to be cleared at minimum cost.

2. PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Leaders (Nature-Positive Performers): Demonstrate verifiable "Net Positive Impact" or Net Gain by using robust, quantifiable biodiversity loss-gain accounting.

Laggards (Compliance-Focused): Target minimal "No Net Loss" or rely on vague promises of environmental management, often failing to secure long-term social acceptance and permits.

3. DATA & VERIFICATION

Leaders (Nature-Positive Performers): Utilise Ecosystem Condition (EC) metrics, Quality Hectares (QHa), and Species Insights to confidently report dependencies and impacts to investors. Data is used to generate auditable, non-subjective evidence.

Laggards (Compliance-Focused): Rely on weak indicators (like inaccurate forms of STAR or MSA) that are notoriously inaccurate as a measure of the state of nature at a location.

4. MARKET ACCESS

Leaders (Nature-Positive Performers): Access the high-value "green" supply chain (e.g., for energy transition minerals) by providing verifiable proof of responsible environmental management, commanding a premium price.

Laggards (Compliance-Focused): Face potential market exclusion or share price risk due to a lack of demonstrable proof of provenance, resulting in customer loss and reputational risk.

Enabling Conditions

The two most critical enabling conditions for scaling nature-positive business models are the Alignment of Finance and Metrics and the creation of Affordable, Scalable MRV Systems.

1. Alignment of Finance and Metrics (Policy & Finance)

The fundamental requirement is to ensure that the metrics used for risk management and tracking impact converge with the KPIs required by nature finance markets.

• Financial Drivers: The industry needs to deliver the specific KPIs, metrics, and insights that satisfy nature finance markets, including performance monitoring, impact delivery, and target tracking, especially for impact investment tracking. This financial mechanism drives the need for high-resolution data at different resolutions (high-res for nature-positive projects, medium for asset portfolios, low for landscape-level risk).

• Regulatory Backstop: Regulations driving due diligence on sourcing and traceability (linked to deforestation and biodiversity loss) are key. These regulations ensure that all companies, not just leaders, begin to integrate nature into their due diligence and risk assessment, making the failure to act a financial and legal liability.

2. Affordable, Scalable MRV Systems (Technology & Partnerships)

The capability to measure nature must move from expensive, one-off surveys to mass-producible, continuous data collection that can be scaled across vast landscapes, such as agricultural supply chains.

• Technological Affordability and Scale: This requires delivering Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) at an affordable price point (e.g., clear $/ha pricing). Technology must move towards a 'data engine' that utilises forms of site-derived biodiversity data (eDNA, bioacoustics, remote sensing, camera traps) and provides the metrics in the most ingestible format possible, along with AI-driven summaries and clustering, to be useful for large enterprises.

• Data Generation Partnerships: Given the scale of data needed, no single entity can generate it alone. Collaborating with philanthropy and data centres (e.g., Microsoft, TNC, and various financial and government bodies) is crucial to accelerate the generation of high-resolution insights into restoration and protected landscapes. This external data generation addresses the need for reference conditions and tracking resilience without requiring every client to pay for its creation.

‍